Monday, February 18, 2019
Oedipal Complex in Hamlet Essay -- Shakespeare Hamlet Essays
settlement and the Oedipal Complex In Shakespeares hamlet, the title pieces main, and only flaw, is his delay. This seems to constitute the central part in Hamlet. By the definition of tragedy, there should exist a flaw in the character of the main hero, who is a great personality that is engaged in a struggle that ends catastrophically. Various reasons for Hamlets delay are given. Important issues like madness, melancholy and cowardice are discussed, but the evidence reveals that he is capable of lively action, we deem him as an intelligent man and can therefore close down that he is only pretending madness. To regard him simply as distraint from melancholy is not a sufficient explanation as he is eager to avenge the death of his father, but cannot bring himself to examine action. It is open-and-shut that the reason for not carrying pop the revenge is not due to each moral apprehensions or fear of divine retribution. There is something special rough this tas k that makes it impossible for Hamlet to carry out the deed. The inability to take action stems from distinctive feelings within Hamlet, his Oedipal Complex. Hamlet has the perfect opportunity to sweep away Claudius in Act 3 Scene 3, yet he fails to tie it. He fears that killing Claudius will automatically send Claudius to heaven without punishment. Hamlet himself remarks And now Ill dot. And so a goes to heaven and so I am revenged. That would be scanned A villain kills my father, and for that I, his sole son do this selfsame(prenominal) villain to heaven. (3.3.74-78). Hamlet may believe he is delaying from fear of move Claudius to a heavenly afterlife however, there are clock times when Hamlet could have killed Claudius when he was not at prayer. Claudius is not ... ... he is delaying out of fear is invalid. Hamlet also may have plenty of time to kill Claudius when he is not in prayer, so any recitation that includes Hamlets concerns for Claudius afterlife is a lso invalid. Both of these interpretations rely on Hamlet being conscious of his actions. If Hamlet is not conscious of his behaviour, it must be because his entrust stems from that part of him in which he is unaware, his id. Works Cited and Consulted Guerin, Wilfred L., Earle Labor, Lee Morgan, Jeanne C. Reeseman, and John R. Willingham. A Handbook of Critical Approaches to Literature. New York Oxford University Press, 1992. Leong, Virginia. The Oedipal Complex. 06 December 1997. (07 December 1997) Shakespeare, William. Hamlet, Prince of Denmark. The Riverside Shakespeare. ED. G. Blakemore Evans. capital of Massachusetts Haughton Mifflin Company, 1974.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment