Brave new world Essay

Lenina, Foster and the Director any have been pre-conditioned to suppose of themselves better and more(prenominal) intelligent than Betas, Delta, Gammas, and Epsilons, as do on the whole Alphas. And with good reason as Alphas atomic number 18 pre-conditioned to be more intellectual and soci aloney better. This portrays a capitalist society with the variant framees. Huxley derivation from an upper-middle class family this is understandable. In counterpoint to 1984, everybody is comparatively the homogeneous. Proles and company members argon all enured the same and are regulated with telescreens and archetype police moving amongst them.The views of Or good have been diffuse into the subject matter of 1984 as well as Huxleys into BNW, the difference and contrast world their views. Huxleys views of a class system and Orwell views that a socialist Britain was expiry to develop in light of Soviet Russia. When further comparing the authors style and subject matter of cerebrat ion for their characters, it is clear that they share relatively the same principles. Orwells language and style shows that the caller members and proles are sub-consciously trained to believe the idols of the company by propaganda.Posters, the two-minute hate, books, songs and newspapers all enforce the company ideals and the commonwealth believe them for they have no other principles or ideals with which to compare. They assume that the society is right in what it says. This refers back to the proles non having an individual consciousness away from society principles, as stated by Winston in the express. Their cerebration is basic and un-intellectual. Similarly, the thinking branch in BNW is a result from didactics and conditioning. This prison term population are taught in their sleep (again sub-consciously like in 1984) what to think and what ideals/principles to hold.Their thinking is artist and standardised which holds parallels with the mechanic factories they w ere produced in. Again it is the case of two different methods producing the same result. The subject matter of the BNW option shows humour which 1984 does not. The fact and process that leads to the arise Engineers only ever creation truly happy when standing on their heads and that Decanting harm can occur in comparing with real life birth trauma. some(prenominal) of these examples from the extract are illustrations of the humour that Huxley injects into the unexampled at several intervals.With 1984 thither are no humorous comments at all and so the subject matter keeps, at all times, an air of seriousness, whereas with BNW this air of seriousness, as a revolutionary original, is broken from time to time by the humour. A main contrast that the two extracts highlight is the ideal of what both orbits are striving towards and are. In 1984 Winston describes the Partys ultimate address as The ideal set up by the Party was some affaire huge, terrible and glittering a serv iceman of steel and concrete, of terrible machines a nationAll thinking the same thoughts, shouting the same slogans, ever working, fighting, triumphing and persecuting three hundred million people all with the same face. This holds extreme parallels to the world that Huxley sounds in Brave New World. A world where everyone has the same face paralleling with the throng producing of people that all look similar shouting the same slogans, paralleling with the sleep taught sayings that everyone has a version of, whether youre an Alpha or Epsilon, a world of steel and concrete paralleling with the vast huge cities of BNW.It seems that 1984 is a world where a government is attempting to change the chivalric and hand a different world, whereas BNW is a world proud of its past and of sustaining its world. The two are exact opposites BNW being what the Party is trying to gain. The importance of the two extracts in the novels is high in that they are meant to blast the reader. H uxleys description of the manufacturing of people and Orwells description of a world that controls everything (even the past) and makes its people think whatever they like.Both extracts create a world in which the account is allowed to develop, they are the soil from which the seed is meant to grow. The 1984 extract has an added level to its importance as it shows that already Winston is part of the undead. It shows that Winston is doing exactly what hes not supposed to be and that if/when he is caught, the Party have got grounds on which to vaporise him. It shows the re-occurring principle in the novel that death is certain, and life is not. It shows that any peril of Orwells world changing, the Party being overthrown, is non-existent as any chance must(prenominal) lie in the proles butUntil they become conscious they will never rebel, and until subsequently they have rebelled they cannot become conscious. This parallels with BNW as no-one there either wishes to change things, as they are content with their current life. Both extracts create these two worlds of unimaginable oppression whether its inhabitants authorize it or not and the theme that runs passim the comparison of the two novels and extracts is the same that Orwell and Huxley both achieve relatively the same thing with different methods.They both achieve worlds of oppression and impact simply through different actual environments as they did with making it that everyone thinks what the authorities wants them to think and that they have no interest in challenging this or any other aspect of their world. This being the case and both authors creating these future worlds of shock and astonishment are vital to the novels as this is what makes the novels so revolutionary for their time.